CrowNet 2.0 - towards more automated tree canopy cover monitoring

phenology
canopy cover
webcam
Published

October 5, 2026

Continuous monitoring of tree canopy structure and its seasonal development is central for a wide range of studies, including phenology, carbon and nutrient cycling, and global change. While satellite remote sensing provides repeated information for spatially-extensive applications, in situ repeat photography allows finer spatial and temporal scales, being suitable for continuous field monitoring at tree to stand scale.

Above-canopy phenological monitoring systems like Phenocams have been widely used for long-term monitoring (Sonnentag et al. 2012). In recent times, studies pointed out that standard below-canopy digital repeat cameras, including camera traps and security webcams, can provide a cheaper, simpler and more flexible solution for short term monitoring (Chianucci, Bajocco, and Ferrara 2021; Chianucci et al. 2025).

Camera-traps installed near the ground and oriented upward (Chianucci, Bajocco, and Ferrara 2021)

An example is the CrowNet system, which is based on repeat daily automated monitoring using time-lapse camera traps (Chianucci et al. 2025).

CrowNet system is based on standard trail-cameras, mounted on a shelf, and oriented towards the tree canopy (Chianucci et al. 2025)

However, the main limitations of CrowNet and similar below-canopy camera systems are the need to improve the weatherproofing camera system, the automation in screening procedure, and the implementation of a online transmission protocol for remotely-check data acquisition and storage, while allowing remote processing of the images.

We are introducing an improved monitoring system (CrowNet 2.0), which is based on an upward-looking webcam system for continuous digital tree canopy image acquisition.

A dome-protected webcam used in CrowNet 2.0

The webcam installed on a tree

The key-mprovement in the CrowNet 2.0 system can be summarised as:

Sub-daily canopy image were then quality-checked using automated screening filters, which isolated most of the variability due to adverse weather, uneven sky conditions and sun-glares.

Three checking routines are performed using coveR (Chianucci, Ferrara, and Puletti 2022) R package.

The CrowNet 2.0 system has been presented in the Italian National Congress of Silviculture and Forest Ecology in Sep 2026, and we plan to publish soon an article describing all the methodology.

Chianucci et al.CrowNet 2.0: towards more automated acquisition, storage, transmissition and screening of continuous digital tree canopy images. URL: https://congressi.sisef.org/xv-congresso/materials/2026_09_19_xv_congresso_sisef_abstract_book_posters.pdf

References

Chianucci, Francesco, Sofia Bajocco, and Carlotta Ferrara. 2021. “Continuous Observations of Forest Canopy Structure Using Low-Cost Digital Camera Traps.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 307 (September): 108516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108516.
Chianucci, Francesco, Carlotta Ferrara, and Nicola Puletti. 2022. “coveR: An R Package for Processing Digital Cover Photography Images to Retrieve Forest Canopy Attributes.” Trees 36 (6): 1933–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-022-02338-5.
Chianucci, Francesco, Alice Lenzi, Emma Minari, Matteo Guasti, Silvia Gisondi, Marco Gonnelli, Simone Innocenti, et al. 2025. “CrowNet: A Trail-Camera Canopy Monitoring System.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 372 (September): 110596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110596.
Sonnentag, Oliver, Koen Hufkens, Cory Teshera-Sterne, Adam M. Young, Mark Friedl, Bobby H. Braswell, Thomas Milliman, John O’Keefe, and Andrew D. Richardson. 2012. “Digital Repeat Photography for Phenological Research in Forest Ecosystems.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 152 (January): 159–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.009.

Reuse